Well I might as well add on to this as I have yet to post on one of these threads. I am both an EZ user and soon to be a festool user (sanders to start.) I use my EZ system with a Porter-Cable Mag 25. I get good results but mainly do not expect to have a finished cut using this set up. There are two primary reasons for this:
1. Operator error - regardless of which system (EZ or Festool) I still have to mark crosscuts on long boards with my eyes, pencil and then line up the guide. When I am doing multiple of these I automatically introduce errors. The particular cut I have is a 15 inch long crosscut on a piece of plywood 75" long. What I actually ended up doing is using my SCMS set up and flipping the board over. That gave me the best results.
2. My Mag 325 does not have a blade in it that gives me a great finishing cut. I could change the blade but for the most part, I break down to rough sizes and finish on my TS with a WWII blade.
Now number one above is going to exist regardless of whether I use EZ or Feestool. Number two above has an interesting twist but it is really comparing the Festool Circular saw to the PC Mag 325. I could not justify the price of the Festool Circular saw for what I do (not anyone else.) Is Festool's circular saw good? Absolutely. I have had my opportunity using it and it is a wonderful saw. If I had unlimited funds it would be in my arsenal.
However, for how I do woodworking (if you can call it that) I could not see that as my best bang for the buck. I would not use it enough (currently) to justify that expense. You might ask how do I justify the festool sander expense and I can say right off the bat that the dust collection is the primary reason (the mag 325 with a shop vac gives some decent DC.) Health issues and built-ins lend myself to justifying the sanders.
That is just from my perspective.
Regards,
Jeff
There are three types of people in this world: those who want things to happen, those who make things happen and those who just wonder what the heck happened.